Dynamics of Access to Justice for Marginalized Communities in Urban Green-Space Utilization Conflicts During Ongoing Social and Environmental Transitions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/greensocial.v1i3.258Keywords:
Environmental Justice, Legal Remedies, Marginalized Communities, Urban Green-Space, Urban PlanningAbstract
Urban green-space conflicts have emerged as a significant challenge for marginalized communities, exacerbating existing social and environmental inequalities in cities undergoing rapid urbanization and environmental transitions. This study explores the dynamics of access to justice for marginalized groups in the context of urban green-space conflicts, focusing on the barriers they face and the enabling factors that improve their ability to access legal remedies. Through a socio-legal research design, data was collected using surveys, case reviews, and stakeholder interviews, which were analyzed to identify key physical, socio-economic, and institutional barriers that hinder equitable access to green spaces. Findings revealed that marginalized communities often experience physical barriers such as limited proximity to green spaces, socio-economic disparities that prevent them from accessing legal resources, and institutional constraints, including discriminatory urban planning policies. Despite these challenges, enabling factors such as legal aid networks, participatory forums, and inclusive urban planning policies emerged as crucial elements in improving access to justice for these communities. Moreover, the study examined the impact of social and environmental transitions, such as urbanization and climate change, on justice outcomes, showing that these transitions can either exacerbate or alleviate barriers depending on how policies are implemented. The study emphasizes the need for policy reforms that promote equity in urban planning and legal aid systems, ensuring that marginalized communities are included in decision-making processes. Future research should explore the impact of environmental justice policies in global contexts and investigate new legal frameworks to address the specific needs of vulnerable populations.
References
Bao, Z., Bai, Y., & Geng, T. (2023). Examining spatial inequalities in public green space accessibility: A focus on disadvantaged groups in England. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813507
Bates, A., Nwadiaru, O. V., Goldstein, A., Cantor, J., Cowan, M., Shokooh, M. P., & Harper, K. (2024). Whose low-carbon future? Community perceptions and expectations on the renewable energy transition in a post-industrial city. Energy Research and Social Science, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103781
Biernacka, M., & Kronenberg, J. (2018). Classification of institutional barriers affecting the availability, accessibility, and attractiveness of urban green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 36, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.007
Carmona, M. S., & Donald, K. (2015). Beyond legal empowerment: Improving access to justice from the human rights perspective. International Journal of Human Rights, 19(3), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1029340
Chen, Y., Men, H., & Ke, X. (2023). Optimizing urban green space patterns to improve spatial equity using location-allocation model: A case study in Wuhan. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127922
Durojaye, E., Mirugi-Mukundi, G., & Adeniyi, O. (2020). Legal empowerment as a tool for engendering access to justice in South Africa. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 20(4), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229120969602
Haase, A. (2024). Inequalities and injustices of urban green regeneration: Applying the conflict analysis perspective. Land, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/land13030296
Haque, M. N., & Sharifi, A. (2024). Who are marginalized in accessing urban ecosystem services? A systematic literature review. Land Use Policy, 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107266
Johnston, M., Darkey, D., & Ibsen, H. (2023). Environmental justice and dissent for postcolonial urban sustainability transitions. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 47(4), 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13179
Kronenberg, J., Łaszkiewicz, E., Andersson, E., & Biernacka, M. (2023). Popular but exclusive: How can lower socio-economic status groups win access to urban green spaces? Geoforum, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103774
Larson, D. A. (2019). Access to justice. In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_570
Lewartowska, E., Anguelovski, I., Oscilowicz, E., Triguero-Mas, M., Cole, H., Shokry, G., Pérez-del-Pulgar, C., & Connolly, J. J. T. (2024). Racial inequity in green infrastructure and gentrification: Challenging compounded environmental racisms in the green city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 48(2), 294–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13232
Lu, W., Jiang, W., Qiao, D., Liu, Q., Chen, G., Huang, Q., & Xu, C. (2023). Embracing green spaces: Exploring spatiotemporal changes in urban green space accessibility and its equity in Guangzhou, China for sustainable urban greening. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100290
Lu, Y., Rigolon, A., Carver, S., & Wu, J. (2024). Data augmented planning: A data-driven approach to measuring-understanding-optimizing green justice across 263 Chinese cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105981
Naigaga, W. K. (2022). Gender and access to justice and Uganda’s criminal justice system. In Comparative Criminology Across Western and African Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2856-3.ch013
Oleinik, A. (2014). Access to justice as a form of inequality. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(2), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480214
Powell, R. M. (2024). Reproductive justice for disabled people during COVID-19 and beyond. In The Routledge Companion to Gender and Covid-19. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003267904-30
Steele, W., Mata, L., & Fünfgeld, H. (2015). Urban climate justice: Creating sustainable pathways for humans and other species. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.004
Wedyan, M., Cruz, A., Saeidi-Rizi, F., & Kim, J.-H. (2024). The prospective role of new community parks in enhancing human health in marginalized communities: A case of Kellogg Park in Ventura, California, USA. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 12(3), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-0-020021
Wolff, M., Mascarenhas, A., Haase, A., Haase, D., Andersson, E., Borgström, S. T., Kronenberg, J., Łaszkiewicz, E., & Biernacka, M. (2022). Conceptualizing multidimensional barriers: A framework for assessing constraints in realizing recreational benefits of urban green spaces. Ecology and Society, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13180-270217
Wu, J., He, Q., Chen, Y., Lin, J., & Wang, S. (2020). Dismantling the fence for social justice? Evidence based on the inequity of urban green space accessibility in the central urban area of Beijing. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(4), 626–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318793139
Xu, C., Haase, D., & Pauleit, S. (2018). The impact of different urban dynamics on green space availability: A multiple scenario modeling approach for the region of Munich, Germany. Ecological Indicators, 93, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.058
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
