The Role of Islamic Religious Extensions as Street-Level Bureaucrats in The Implementation of Islamic Community Guidance Policies in Batang Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/dynamicssocial.v2i2.282Keywords:
Guidance for the Islamic Community, Islamic Religious Counselors, Michael Lipsky's, Policy Implementation, Street-Level BureaucracyAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of Islamic Religious Counselors as street-level bureaucrats in implementing Islamic Community Guidance policies in Batang Regency. The study used a mixed-methods approach with a sequential explanatory design, beginning with the collection and analysis of quantitative data and then deepening with qualitative data. Quantitative data were obtained from 53 respondents using a questionnaire that was tested for validity and reliability. In contrast, qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation with religious counselors, Ministry of Religious Affairs officials, the KUA (Office of Religious Affairs), and the community. Data analysis was conducted descriptively and analytically using Michael Lipsky's street-level bureaucracy theory as an analytical framework. The study's results indicate that the role of Islamic Religious Extension Workers as street-level bureaucrats is positively and strongly associated with the successful implementation of the Islamic Community Guidance policy (r = 0.826; p < 0.01). Qualitative findings revealed that extension workers exercise discretion in the form of community assistance, adjustments to extension methods, strategic flexibility, and responsiveness to socio-religious issues at the local level. This study confirms that the effectiveness of Islamic Community Guidance policies is not determined solely by formal policy design but is highly dependent on the capacity, flexibility, and discretion of Islamic Religious Counselors, the implementing actors at the field level. These findings provide theoretical contributions to the development of street-level bureaucracy studies in the context of religious policy, as well as practical implications for formulating more contextual and responsive policies.
References
Aditio, B., Finaldi, A., & Roberia, R. (2025). Hubungan diskresi dengan kualitas pelayanan publik dalam perspektif street level bureaucracy. Presidensial: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Negara, dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(4), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.62383/presidensial.v2i4.1302
Ahwadzy, M., Baihaqi, A., Thoha, M., Muqtafa, A. R., Ainurrofiq, R., Al Bustomi, B., & Khoirifo, M. (2025).
Fiqh of bureaucracy and public governance in Indonesia: A new paradigm based on maqasid al shariah. Islamic Review: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Keislaman, 14(2), 197-222. https://doi.org/10.35878/islamicreview.v14i2.1844
Asipi, L. S., Rosalina, U., & Nopiyadi, D. (n.d.). The analysis of reading habits using Miles and Huberman's interactive model to empower students' literacy at IPB Cirebon. International Journal of Education and Humanities (IJEH), 2(3), 117-125. http://i-jeh.com/index.php/ijeh/index
Basir, M. A., Usman, J., & Rahman, A. (n.d.). Formalisasi sistem pemerintahan Islam - studi tentang implementasi kebijakan Perda baca tulis Al Qur'an di Kota Makassar. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/Otoritas/article/view/60
Giosa, R. (2021). Lipsky, M. (edición original, 1980 edición ampliada del 30.º aniversario, 2010): Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Política y Sociedad, 58(2), e73628. https://doi.org/10.5209/poso.73628
Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. SAGE Publications.
Hupe, P. L. (2019). Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786437631
Implementasi kebijakan dan budaya organisasi terhadap kualitas pelayanan publik. Widya Cipta: Jurnal Sekretari dan Manajemen, 2(1). https://ojs.bsi.ac.id/index.php/widyacipta/article/view/2444
Indonesian Government Regulation No. 11 of 2017 on Public Service Standards.
Irtanto, I. (n.d.). Kinerja birokrasi pelayanan sektor publik: Perspektif perkembangan teori. Cakrawala. https://cakrawalajournal.org/index.php/cakrawala/article/view/354
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2018). Petunjuk teknis pelaksanaan tugas penyuluh agama Islam. Jakarta: Kemenag RI.
Kristian Widya Wicaksono. (n.d.). Penataan ulang administrasi publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja. https://jurnal.kemendagri.go.id/index.php/jbp/article/view/66
Lilly, C. C. (1998). Book Review: Creswell, John. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 1(1), 62-62. https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1252
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.2307/1288305
Madani, M., Irvan Nur Iva, M., & Amiruddin, I. (2021). Peran street-level bureaucracy dalam implementasi kebijakan perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan di Kota Makassar. Kolaborasi: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 7(3), 333-343. https://doi.org/10.26618/kjap.v7i3.6406
Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Prasetyanti, R., & Faedlulloh, D. (2017). Islamic perspective on the street-level bureaucrats' dilemma: Discretion versus corruption in public service management. Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 3(2), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.14421/jmd.2017.32-03
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland-University of California Press.
Purwanto, E. A., & Ramadhan, S. D. (2018). Implementasi kebijakan publik. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Raaphorst, N., Groeneveld, S., & Hupe, P. (n.d.). Chapter 8: Discrimination and representation in street-level bureaucracies. In Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context.
Ratih, R., Koeswara, H., Kasmira, A., & Zein, S. S. (2025). Diskresi aktor street-level bureaucrat pada implementasi pendidikan inklusif TK-SMP di Kota Padang. Responsive, 8(4), 601-614. https://doi.org/10.24198/responsive.v8i4.67571
Ridlwan, R. (2015). BUMDes sebagai penguatan ekonomi desa. Jurnal Kebijakan & Administrasi Publik, 19(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.7962
Rohman, D. A., & Nugraha, F. (2022). Mengeksplorasi kompetensi penyuluh agama dalam menyusun naskah materi penyuluhan nilai-nilai moderasi beragama. Harmoni, 21(2), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v21i2.607
Sapdi, R. M., Masykhur, A., Anwar, C., & Sada, H. J. (n.d.). Policy study on the implementation of Islamic education at secondary and higher education. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/tadzkiyyah/article/view/16052
Sugara, R., & Ulfa, M. (2021). Implementasi kebijakan publik dalam penanganan COVID-19 melalui pendekatan keagamaan. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 14(1), 103-132. https://jurnalbimasislam.kemenag.go.id/jbi/article/view/361
https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v14i1.361
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Usman, J. (n.d.). Manajemen birokrasi profesional dalam meningkatkan pelayanan publik. Otoritas: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/Otoritas/article/view/24
Wahab, S. A. (2016). Analisis kebijakan publik. Malang: UMM Press.

