Administrative Capacity in Executive Service Delivery: A Literature Review on Government Protocol Functions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/dynamicssocial.v2i1.263Keywords:
Administrative Capacity, Executive Service Delivery, Government Protocol Functions, Executive Support Systems, Institutional CapacityAbstract
Administrative capacity has long been recognized as a fundamental determinant of governmental effectiveness, yet its role in executive service delivery, particularly in relation to government protocol functions, remains conceptually underdeveloped in public administration scholarship. Existing studies on administrative capacity predominantly focus on policy formulation, implementation, and citizen-facing service delivery, while research on executive governance and executive support systems often treats internal support functions in aggregate terms. As a result, the specific contribution of protocol functions—as administrative, symbolic, and coordinative mechanisms that sustain executive leadership—has been largely overlooked. Addressing this gap, this literature review examines how administrative capacity operates within executive service delivery, with a particular emphasis on government protocol functions as an integral component of executive support and governance coordination. The primary objective of this article is to synthesize and integrate dispersed theoretical and empirical insights to reconceptualize protocol functions within the broader framework of Administrative Capacity Theory. Employing a narrative–integrative literature review approach, the study systematically selected and analyzed peer-reviewed journal articles from major academic databases published within the last five years. The literature was examined through thematic analysis and conceptual synthesis, guided by Administrative Capacity Theory as the core framework and complemented by perspectives on executive service delivery, institutional capacity, street-level bureaucracy, public service professionalism, and governance coordination. The review identifies recurring patterns indicating that effective executive service delivery depends on the interaction of individual-level capacities (professional competence, discretion, and ethics), organizational-level capacities (structures, procedures, and coordination routines), and system-level capacities (institutional arrangements and governance mechanisms).
References
Amossy, R. (2022). Constructing political legitimacy and authority in discourse. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours, 28. https://journals.openedition.org/aad/6398
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2021). Dimensions of public service capacity: Organizational, managerial, and political capacity. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13335
Ansell, C., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2022). The governance of executive coordination. Governance, 35(4), 875–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12624
Cairney, P., Boswell, J., Ayres, S., Durose, C., Elliott, I. C., Flinders, M., Martin, S., & Richardson, L. (2024). The state of British policymaking: How can UK government become more effective? Parliamentary Affairs, 77(4), 837–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsae019
Cepiku, D., Mastrodascio, M., & Bovaird, T. (2021). Public administration capacity in local governance. Local Government Studies, 47(5), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1864377
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2024). Administrative capacity and executive governance: A review and future research agenda. Public Administration Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13702
Corbett, J. (2021). The core executive and small states: Is coordination possible? Public Administration, 99(2), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12682
Evetts, J. (2022). Professionalism, governance and public service work. Current Sociology, 70(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211033755
Hajer, M. (2022). Symbolic governance and public authority. Policy Sciences, 55(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09461-0
Huang, T., & Villadsen, A. R. (2023). Top managers in public organizations: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1618–1634. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13628
Hupe, P. (2021). Broadening the scope of street-level bureaucracy. Public Administration, 99(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12695
Kårtvedt, L. E. (2024). Explaining coordination quality in public service delivery. Local Government Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2024.2315016
Kuhlmann, S., & Wayenberg, E. (2023). Local government capacity and executive coordination. Public Administration, 101(2), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12842
Lodge, M., & Wegrich, K. (2023). The state of the state: Administrative capacity revisited. Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-102057
Noordegraaf, M. (2021). Reconfiguring professionalism in public services. Administration & Society, 53(7), 1070–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720973157
Nugraha, A., et al. (2024). Peran Bagian Protokol Sekretariat Daerah Kota Palembang (studi kualitatif). Parlementer. https://ejournal.appihi.or.id/index.php/Parlementer/article/download/154/280/941
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Steering from the centre of government in times of complexity: Compendium of practices. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/04/steering-from-the-centre-of-government-in-times-of-complexity_45d505ee/69b1f129-en.pdf
Peters, B. G. (2021). Leadership and executive capacity in public administration. Public Organization Review, 21(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00494-1
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2023). Executive governance in complex systems. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13547
Rhodes, R. A. W. (2021). The everyday practices of executive governance. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13278
Scott, W. R. (2021). Institutional theory and public sector reform. Public Administration, 99(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12723
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sumampouw, A., et al. (2025). Peran bagian protokol dan komunikasi pimpinan sekretariat daerah dalam menyusun agenda kepala daerah (studi kualitatif). Administro. https://ejurnal.unima.ac.id/index.php/administro/article/view/13008
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2022). Street-level bureaucracy and discretion in complex service environments. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13390
Van der Wal, Z. (2023). Ethical professionalism in executive public service. Public Integrity, 25(4), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2145120
Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2022). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding public policy competences. Public Administration and Development, 42(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1978
