Risk-Based Internal Oversight of Local Government Finance: A Literature Review on Fraud Prevention and Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70062/dynamicssocial.v2i1.265Keywords:
Risk-Based Internal Oversight, Risk-Based Internal Audit, Fraud Risk Management, Fraud Prevention and Control, Internal Control SystemAbstract
Local governments manage substantial public resources under conditions of decentralization, fiscal complexity, and heightened accountability demands, making them particularly vulnerable to financial mismanagement and fraud. In this context, risk-based internal oversight has increasingly been promoted as a governance-oriented alternative to traditional compliance-based supervision. This literature review article examines how risk-based internal oversight is conceptualized, operationalized, and linked to fraud prevention and control in the management of local government finance. The study addresses a central problem in the existing literature: the fragmentation of analytical perspectives across risk-based internal auditing, fraud risk management, internal control systems, public financial management, and public accountability, which has limited a comprehensive understanding of how internal oversight contributes to safeguarding public funds. The primary objective of this article is to synthesize and integrate these strands of literature to clarify the role of risk-based internal oversight as a systemic governance mechanism for fraud prevention and control at the subnational level. Methodologically, the study employs an integrative literature review approach, drawing on peer-reviewed journal articles and authoritative institutional publications indexed in major academic databases over the past decade. A structured search, screening, and thematic synthesis process was applied to identify patterns, convergences, and divergences across conceptual, empirical, and policy-oriented studies. The findings indicate a clear shift from compliance-oriented inspection toward risk-based internal oversight that prioritizes high-risk financial processes—particularly procurement, grants, and asset management—where fraud risks are most pronounced. The synthesis further shows that effective fraud prevention depends on the alignment of risk-based oversight with fraud risk management practices, robust internal control systems (including SPIP).
References
Alfian, A. (2023). Fraud analytics practices in public-sector transactions: A systematic review. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(5), 685–710. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2022-0175
Amelia, D., & Halim, A. (2021). Evaluasi sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah (SPIP) pada penyusunan laporan keuangan di Dinas Perindustrian dan Perdagangan Kabupaten Sleman. BAJ: Behavioral Accounting Journal, 4(1), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.33005/baj.v4i1.133
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational fraud 2024: A report to the nations. https://www.acfe.com/-/media/files/acfe/pdfs/rttn/2024/2024-report-to-the-nations.pdf
Astiti, S. P., & Agustin, N. (2024). Penerapan sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah (SPIP) pada Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (DPRD) Kota Makassar. Tangible Journal, 9(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.53654/tangible.v9i2.539
Awuah, B., Onumah, J., & Duho, K. (2022). Determinants of adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques among internal audit units. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 88(2), e12203. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12203
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal control—Integrated framework: Executive summary. https://www.sechistorical.org/collection/papers/2010/2013_0501_COSOInternal.pdf
Ferry, L., Midgley, H., & Ruggiero, P. (2023). Regulatory space in local government audit: An international comparative study of 20 countries. Public Money & Management, 43(3), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2022.2129559
Government of Indonesia. (2008). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah (SPIP). https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/api/download/fulltext/2008/60tahun2008pp.htm
Haque, M. S., Ramesh, M., Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., & Gomide, A. D. A. (2021). Building administrative capacity for development: Limits and prospects. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211002605
Institute of Internal Auditors. (2020). The IIA’s Three Lines Model: An update of the Three Lines of Defense. https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/documents/resources/the-iias-three-lines-model-an-update-of-the-three-lines-of-defense-july-2020/three-lines-model-updated-english.pdf
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006
Lino, A. F., Carvalho, L. B., Aquino, A. C. B., & Steccolini, I. (2022). Fighting or supporting corruption? The role of public sector audit organizations in Brazil. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 83, 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102384
Mujalli, A. (2024). Factors affecting the implementation of risk-based internal auditing in public sector organizations. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(5), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17050196
OECD. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework. https://www.oecd.org
OECD. (n.d.). Digital government. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/policy-issues/digital-government.html
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). OECD integrity framework for public sector. https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/oecd-integrity-framework.pdf
Salijeni, G., Samsonova-Taddei, A., & Turley, W. (2021). Understanding how big data technologies reconfigure the nature and organization of financial statement audits: A sociomaterial analysis. European Accounting Review, 30(3), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2021.1882320
Sidauruk, D. L. (2024). Data analytics in fraud prevention and detection by government internal supervisory apparatuses: A mixed-method study. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 9(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v9i2.340
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
United Nations. (2024). United Nations E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development. https://desapublications.un.org
Wahyuni, W., Mattoasi, M., & Monoarfa, V. (2024). Penerapan sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah (SPIP) dan standar operasional prosedur (SOP) terhadap pencegahan fraud pada pengelolaan dana desa. Economics and Digital Business Review, 5(1), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.37531/ecotal.v5i1.1011
Wang, W., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2024). The application of continuous audit and monitoring methodology: A government medication procurement case. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 55, 100713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100713
World Bank. (2020). Finding fraud: GovTech and fraud detection in public administration. https://documents.worldbank.org
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
