Administrative Capacity in Consular Services: A Literature Review on Institutional Readiness in Serving Indonesian Migrant Workers

Authors

  • Agussalim Agussalim Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Amirul Mustofa Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Sarwani Sarwani Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya
  • Dian Ferriswara Universitas Dr. Soetomo Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/dynamicssocial.v2i1.267

Keywords:

Administrative Capacity, Consular Services, Institutional Readiness, Migrant Worker Protection, Public Administration

Abstract

Consular services have become a critical site of state intervention in the governance of international labor migration, particularly for migrant-sending countries such as Indonesia whose citizens depend on overseas missions for administrative protection and access to public services abroad. Despite the growing importance of consular institutions in safeguarding migrant workers’ rights and welfare, existing scholarship remains fragmented, offering limited conceptual integration of how administrative capacity shapes institutional readiness in cross-border public service delivery. Addressing this gap, this article presents a structured narrative–integrative literature review that synthesizes international peer-reviewed studies on administrative capacity, policy capacity, consular services, and migrant worker protection published in the last five years. Drawing on Administrative Capacity Theory as the core framework, complemented by Public Service Theory, Policy Implementation Theory, Street-Level Bureaucracy, and Institutional Theory, the review systematically analyzes how different dimensions of capacity configure institutional readiness in consular services. The findings reveal that institutional readiness emerges from the interaction of four interrelated dimensions: human resource capacity, organizational and procedural capacity, institutional and coordination capacity, and resource and infrastructure capacity. Rather than functioning as isolated determinants, these dimensions collectively shape how consular institutions translate formal mandates into service outcomes under conditions of transnational governance, legal pluralism, and fluctuating demand. The review further demonstrates that frontline discretion, coordination gaps, procedural rigidity, and uneven resource allocation are recurrent patterns across the literature, underscoring the dynamic and practice-based nature of administrative capacity in consular contexts. Theoretically, this article contributes to public administration scholarship by extending administrative capacity frameworks into the underexplored domain of cross-border public services and by integrating previously segmented theoretical perspectives into a coherent conceptual synthesis. By reframing consular services as institutionally embedded public service systems rather than solely diplomatic functions, the article advances understanding of institutional readiness in migrant worker protection and provides a robust analytical foundation for future empirical and comparative research in international public administration.

References

Birka, I., Kļaviņš, D., & Kits, R. (2022). Duty of care: Consular diplomacy response of Baltic and Nordic countries to COVID-19. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 18(1), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10115

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brenton, S. (2023). Policy capacity: Evolving theory and missing links. Policy Studies, 44(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2022.2043266

Csatlós, E. (2022). European administration of consular protection. Institutiones Administrationis – Journal of Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.v2i1.44

Glyniadaki, E. (2024). Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of migration policy. Journal of Public Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X24000217

Grindle, M. S. (1996). Challenging the state: Crisis and innovation in Latin America and Africa. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667100

Haque, M. S., Ramesh, M., Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., & Gomide, A. D. A. (2021). Building administrative capacity for development: Limits and prospects. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211002605

Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2022). Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences in policy-making. Policy Sciences, 55(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09447-4

Howlett, M., & Wu, X. (2018). Policy capacity: The forgotten dimension in policy studies. Policy and Society, 37(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1484386

McDermid, P., Craig, A., Sheel, M., & Seale, H. (2022). How have governments supported citizens stranded abroad due to COVID-19 travel restrictions? BMC Infectious Diseases, 22, 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07155-2

Rosenblum, M. R., & Meissner, D. W. (2021). Protecting migrant workers abroad: Consular services and state capacity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(14), 3279–3296. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625124

Saddi, F. C., Peckham, S., Bloom, G., Turnbull, N., Coelho, V. S., & Denis, J.-L. (2023). Employing the policy capacity framework for health system strengthening. Policy and Society, 42(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac031

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Van der Heijden, J., & Kuhlmann, J. (2022). Studying policy implementation in public administration: Towards a practice-oriented perspective. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 620–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13444

Walsh, J., & Ferazzoli, M. T. (2025). Rethinking street-level bureaucracy: Everyday bordering and networks of enactment and resistance in mixed welfare economies. Journal of Social Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279425101207

Downloads

Published

2026-02-25

How to Cite

Agussalim Agussalim, Amirul Mustofa, Sarwani Sarwani, & Dian Ferriswara. (2026). Administrative Capacity in Consular Services: A Literature Review on Institutional Readiness in Serving Indonesian Migrant Workers. Dynamics Social : International Journal of Social Sciences and Communication, 2(1), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.70062/dynamicssocial.v2i1.267

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.