National Legislative Strategies for Strengthening Corporate Accountability for Environmental Damage and Social Justice in Industrial Pollution

Authors

  • Satriya Nugraha Universitas Palangka Raya, Hendrik Timang Street
  • Retno Saraswasti Universitas Diponegoro, Dr. Antonius Suroyo Street
  • Nikmah Fitriah Universitas Diponegoro, Dr. Antonius Suroyo Street

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/greensocial.v2i4.272

Keywords:

Corporate Accountability, Environmental Justice, Judicial Measures, Legislative Frameworks, Pollution Control

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of national legislative strategies in promoting corporate accountability for industrial pollution and social justice violations. It analyzes a comparative legal framework, focusing on laws, enforcement mechanisms, and corporate liability regimes in countries such as France, Germany, Norway, China, and Australia. The research evaluates how mandatory due diligence laws, judicial measures, and transparency mechanisms help hold corporations accountable for environmental impacts. It compares voluntary compliance models with mandatory legal frameworks, noting the limitations of voluntary agreements in driving substantial environmental changes. Findings show that countries with strong legal frameworks, like the EU and Australia, achieve higher corporate compliance and environmental performance, while voluntary measures struggle to produce meaningful results. The study emphasizes the need for stronger enforcement, higher penalties for violations, and enhanced public transparency. Additionally, it explores integrating environmental justice considerations, such as community participation and fair compensation, into national strategies. The study offers policy recommendations for improving corporate responsibility through better legislation, harmonizing laws across jurisdictions, and fostering collaboration among governments, corporations, and civil society. It also suggests future research directions, including examining the long-term impacts of environmental justice policies in different global contexts.

References

Almaqtari, F. A., Raweh, N. A., & Abdullah, A. A. H. (2025). Investigating the legal frameworks governing environmental accounting practices and their implications for corporate sustainability reporting in Saudi Arabia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 13(1), 249-290. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol13no1.977

Ateeq, A., Saeed, J., & Ateeq, R. A. (2025). Enhancing corporate sustainability through transparency and accountability: A strategic approach for environmental and social governance. Studies in Big Data, 169, 483-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80656-8_44

Basu, P., & Chakraborty, J. (2016). Environmental justice implications of industrial hazardous waste generation in India: A national scale analysis. Environmental Research Letters, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/12/125001

Byrne, J., & Rich, D. (2021). Toward a political economy of global change: Energy, environment and development in the greenhouse. In Energy and Environment: The Policy Challenge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429337031-13

Chen, R., He, X., & Shirani Bidabadi, F. (2023). Corporate environmental compliance in China: From social responsibility to soft law. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032379

Chi, T., & Yang, Z. (2024). Trends in corporate environmental compliance research: A bibliometric analysis (2004-2024). Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135527

Dehbi, F., & Martin-Ortega, O. (2023). An integrated approach to corporate due diligence from a human rights, environmental, and TWAIL perspective. Regulation and Governance, 17(4), 927-943. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12538

Li, Q., Wang, Z., & Zhou, R. (2025). Residents' environmental participation and corporate green management: The influence of mandatory and voluntary behaviors. Finance Research Letters, 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107444

Liu, W., Tsai, S.-B., Wu, C.-H., Shao, X., & Wacławek, M. (2022). Corporate environmental management and sustainable operation: Theory and application. Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, 29(3), 283-285. https://doi.org/10.2478/eces-2022-0020

Makarenko, O. Y., Ustinova-Boichenko, H. M., Makarenko, N. A., Nazymko, O. V., & Hromenko, Y. O. (2022). Strengthening the control of enterprises with industrial pollution of atmospheric air. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 3, 112-117. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-3/112

Morgera, E. (2020). Corporate environmental accountability in international law. In Corporate Environmental Accountability in International Law. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738046.001.0001

Mushtaq, B. (2025). Industrialisation and environmental degradation in Asia: Rethinking growth through an ecological lens. Pakistan Development Review, 64(1), 97-124. https://doi.org/10.30541/v64i1pp.97-124

Nurse, A. (2016). Cleaning up greenwash: A critical evaluation of the activities of oil companies in the Niger. In Hazardous Waste and Pollution: Detecting and Preventing Green Crimes. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18081-6_9

Pei, P., & Chang, X. (2025). Corporate social governance ESG policies and energy efficiency in G20 countries: The impact of policy coherence on environmental sustainability. Energy and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X251349469

Phuong, N. D., & Thanh, N. D. (2025). Law on compensation for damages owing to environmental pollution by business organizations in Vietnam. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025122

Sasana, H., Prasetyanto, P. K., Priyono, N., & Novitaningtyas, I. (2022). The importance of sustainable waste management due to socio-economic changes. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(3), 170-174. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.12665

Shima, K., & Fung, S. (2019). Voluntary disclosure of environmental performance after regulatory change: Evidence from the utility industry. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(2), 287-324. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2018-0265

Ullah, M. H., Hazelton, J., & Nelson, P. F. (2021). Can databases facilitate accountability? The case of Australian mercury accounting via the National Pollutant Inventory. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 34(1), 164-193. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2017-3232

Wang, L., Pan, M., Qian, X., & Lv, K. (2025). Do specialized courts matter? Environmental judiciary and corporate emissions in China. Energy Policy, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114532

Wang, Z., Hubacek, K., Sun, X., & Ruzzenenti, F. (2026). Landscape of research on accounting scope 3 emissions: A review of methodologies and data. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70429

Waspiah, W., Rosida, H., Maharani, A., Maryani, I., Detalim, M., & Arifin, R. (2023). Law reform in corporate criminalization in environmental damage cases in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(4), 619-647. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i4.74133

Widjaja, G. (2024). Legal and environmental responsibility towards justice in industrial pollution. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6599

Yang, H., Le Luo, L., & Bhattacharyya, A. (2021). Mandatory environmental reporting in Australia: An in-depth analysis of quantity and quality. Abacus, 57(4), 737-779. https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12231

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Satriya Nugraha, Retno Saraswasti, & Nikmah Fitriah. (2025). National Legislative Strategies for Strengthening Corporate Accountability for Environmental Damage and Social Justice in Industrial Pollution . Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs, 2(4), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.70062/greensocial.v2i4.272

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.